Charlie Kirk Had ‘Break-Up’ with Candace Owens After She Went ‘Too Down the Rabbit Holes’
In recent years, the conservative political landscape has witnessed many alliances and disagreements, but few have been as talked about as the fallout between Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens. Once close collaborators within the influential organization Turning Point USA (TPUSA), their relationship reportedly fractured due to Owens’ increasingly extreme views. This article explores the background of their partnership, the reasons behind their break-up, and what it means for the broader conservative movement.
The Break-Up Between Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens
Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, and Candace Owens, a prominent conservative commentator and former TPUSA communications director, were once seen as a powerful duo shaping right-leaning activism. Their collaboration began over a decade ago, with both working closely to promote conservative values among young Americans. However, according to Eric Bolling, an advisory board member of TPUSA, their relationship deteriorated as Owens’ perspectives became “too down the rabbit holes.”
Bolling, a former Fox News and Newsmax host, revealed on the “PBD Podcast” that while Kirk and Owens were “tight” during their early years at TPUSA, they eventually had a “break-up” because Owens’ theories and rhetoric grew too extreme for the organization’s taste. Despite this, Kirk maintained a cordial friendship with Owens for several years, though communication between them has reportedly ceased in recent times.
Owens served as TPUSA’s communications director from 2017 to 2019 and continued to appear at TPUSA events as a guest speaker until as recently as 2024. However, her departure from a formal role marked the beginning of a gradual distancing from the group. Bolling noted that Owens has not maintained a relationship with Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, further highlighting the rift.
Context and Consequences of the Rift
The break-up between Kirk and Owens is emblematic of broader tensions within conservative circles, where ideological purity and strategic disagreements often lead to fractures. Owens’ shift toward more controversial and conspiratorial viewpoints reportedly made her a divisive figure even among her former allies.
One notable point of contention involved allegations surrounding pro-Israel influences within TPUSA. Owens accused billionaire hedge fund mogul Bill Ackman of orchestrating a hostile intervention to pressure Kirk over his views on Israel, a claim Ackman vehemently denied. These accusations added fuel to the already strained relationship between Owens and the Kirk circle.
Eric Bolling expressed skepticism about Owens’ narrative, stating he found no evidence of threats or blackmail in the situation. Meanwhile, TPUSA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet emphasized that despite the break-up, Kirk and Owens remained friends, though the communication pipeline has been inactive for years.
The fallout also reflects the challenges conservative organizations face in balancing diverse viewpoints while maintaining a cohesive public image. Owens’ trajectory from a key TPUSA figure to a more independent and controversial voice underscores the complexities of political activism in the digital age.
Impact on Conservative Activism and Public Perception
The publicized break-up between Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens has had ripple effects across conservative media and activism. Their once united front helped galvanize young conservatives, but their split has highlighted ideological divides that complicate coalition-building.
Owens’ continued prominence as a podcaster and commentator means her influence remains significant, though her relationship with TPUSA and Kirk’s legacy is now distant. Meanwhile, Kirk continues to lead TPUSA with a focus on more mainstream conservative messaging.
This dynamic illustrates the evolving nature of political alliances, where personal relationships intersect with ideological battles. For supporters and observers alike, the Kirk-Owens break-up serves as a case study in how political movements manage internal dissent and public controversies.
Conclusion
The break-up between Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens after she went “too down the rabbit holes” marks a significant chapter in contemporary conservative activism. Their story reveals how ideological differences and personal dynamics can reshape political alliances. As both figures continue to influence the conservative landscape in their own ways, understanding their past collaboration and eventual split offers valuable insights into the challenges of maintaining unity in a polarized environment.
If you want to stay informed about the latest developments in political activism and conservative movements, be sure to follow our updates and join the conversation today!