Charlie Kirk Had ‘Break-Up’ with Candace Owens After She Went ‘Too Down the Rabbit Holes’
The Break-Up Between Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens: When Political Allies Part Ways
Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens were once considered a dynamic duo within conservative activism, especially through their work with Turning Point USA (TPUSA). However, recent revelations from insiders have shed light on a rift that developed between the two, culminating in what has been described as a “break-up.” According to Eric Bolling, a former Fox News and Newsmax host who has been closely involved with TPUSA, the split occurred because Owens’ views began to veer “too down the rabbit holes,” becoming too extreme for the organization’s leadership and Kirk’s personal comfort.
This break-up is significant not only because of the stature both individuals hold in right-leaning political circles but also because it highlights the challenges of maintaining unity within activist movements when ideological differences intensify. The fallout between Kirk and Owens underscores the delicate balance between free expression and organizational coherence in politically charged environments.
Background: The Rise of Kirk and Owens in Conservative Activism
Charlie Kirk founded Turning Point USA in 2012 with the goal of promoting conservative values among young Americans. Candace Owens joined the organization as its communications director in 2017 and quickly became a prominent voice within the conservative movement. Their partnership helped propel TPUSA into the national spotlight, with both figures frequently appearing at events, rallies, and in media interviews.
Despite Owens’ departure from her formal role at TPUSA in 2019, she continued to maintain a presence at TPUSA events as a guest speaker for several years afterward. This ongoing association suggested that the relationship between Kirk and Owens remained amicable for some time.
What Led to the Rift?
Eric Bolling revealed on the “PBD Podcast” that the turning point in Kirk and Owens’ relationship came when Owens’ political theories and public statements began to stray into more controversial and extreme territory. Bolling explained that while Kirk and Owens were “tight” during their early collaboration, Owens’ views eventually became “too extreme for [TPUSA’s] taste.”
The divergence reportedly led to a cooling of communications between the two, with Kirk maintaining a cordial friendship but no longer engaging in regular dialogue. Owens’ increasingly radical positions, which some insiders described as “going too far down the rabbit holes,” created a barrier that neither party was willing or able to overcome.
Impact on TPUSA and Conservative Circles
The break-up between Kirk and Owens has had ripple effects within TPUSA and the broader conservative movement. Owens’ departure from the organization’s inner circle and the subsequent distancing by Kirk signaled a shift in the group’s approach to messaging and leadership.
Moreover, the split has fueled speculation and debate among conservative commentators and supporters about the boundaries of acceptable discourse within the movement. Owens’ trajectory toward more extreme views has sparked discussions about ideological purity, the role of dissent, and the challenges of coalition-building in politically polarized times.
Controversies and Allegations Surrounding the Fallout
Adding complexity to the break-up are allegations and controversies involving other prominent figures. Owens has accused billionaire hedge fund mogul Bill Ackman and others of orchestrating a hostile intervention aimed at silencing Kirk over his views on Israel. These claims have been denied by Ackman and disputed by insiders familiar with the situation.
Additionally, Owens has made provocative statements on social media, including unfounded accusations against media outlets. These developments have further strained her relationships within conservative networks and contributed to the distancing from Kirk and TPUSA.
Current Status of Kirk and Owens’ Relationship
According to Eric Bolling and TPUSA spokespersons, while Kirk and Owens once shared a close friendship, they have not maintained a communication pipeline for several years. Owens no longer holds any formal role with TPUSA and has not appeared at its events recently.
Despite the break-up, some maintain that the two still respect each other on a personal level, though their political paths have clearly diverged. The situation reflects the broader tensions within political activism where personal relationships are often tested by ideological differences.
Conclusion
The break-up between Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens serves as a telling example of how political alliances can fracture when views become too extreme or divergent. Their story highlights the challenges faced by activist organizations in balancing diverse perspectives while maintaining cohesion. For those interested in the evolving landscape of conservative activism, understanding this rift offers valuable insight into the complexities of leadership, ideology, and friendship in the political arena.
If you want to stay informed about the latest developments in political activism and conservative movements, be sure to follow our updates and share your thoughts on this evolving story.