Steve Burton’s ex-wife denied alienating father-child affection, filed an urgent motion to relocate: Victim of slander or a plot to brainwash the children? Let us know your assessment!

Featured Image

Steve Burton’s Ex-Wife Sheree Denies She Alienated Him From Their Daughter, Requests to Move

Sheree Burton Responds to Alienation Claims Amid Custody Dispute

Steve Burton’s ex-wife, Sheree Burton, has firmly denied accusations that she is alienating their 12-year-old daughter, Brooklyn, from the General Hospital star. The former couple, who divorced in 2022 after 23 years of marriage, are currently embroiled in a custody dispute complicated by recent relocations and disagreements over parenting arrangements.

In court documents filed on August 6, 2024, Sheree, 49, requested permission from the court to move from Orange County, California, to Tennessee with Brooklyn. This request comes despite Steve Burton’s recent decision to relocate back to California from Tennessee. Sheree’s filing emphasizes that Brooklyn has unrestricted access to her father through modern technology, including an iPad that allows for calls, texts, and FaceTime conversations, countering Steve’s claims that she is being alienated.

Details of the Custody Arrangement and Communication Challenges

Sheree and Steve share custody of Brooklyn, along with two adult children, Makena, 22, and Jack, 20. According to the current custody order, Steve has visitation rights with Brooklyn one weekend per month during the school year, a schedule that was established when the parents lived in different states.

Despite this arrangement, Sheree acknowledges that communication between her and Steve is strained. She describes their interactions as “poor” and claims that Steve’s messages often contain unfounded accusations, including allegations of parental alienation. Sheree insists that she is following the custody orders agreed upon by both parties and that any claims to the contrary are inaccurate.

The custody dispute intensified after Steve’s move to Tennessee in February 2024, which Sheree says was the second time he relocated cross-country without Brooklyn. Before his move, Steve signed a new custody schedule that Sheree believed was in Brooklyn’s best interest. This schedule aimed to ensure Brooklyn’s “frequent and continuing contact” with her father while maintaining her primary residence with Sheree in California.

However, disagreements over the details of this stipulation led Steve to return to court. Around the time mediation began, Steve announced plans to move back to California, allegedly to be closer to Brooklyn. Sheree agreed to grant Steve additional visitation time over the summer but noted that his plans remained unstable and subject to change.

Sheree’s Argument for Relocation to Tennessee

Sheree’s request to move to Tennessee is grounded in her assertion that she is Brooklyn’s stable parent. She argues that although relocating would be a change for their daughter, it would provide a more consistent and secure environment. Sheree also points out that Steve does not currently have a stable residence in California, which she believes weakens his case for primary custody or increased visitation.

Furthermore, Sheree expresses concern about Brooklyn’s potential care if she remains in California, where Steve’s new wife, Michelle Lundstrom, would assume a significant caregiving role. Steve married Michelle in May 2025, and Sheree suggests that Brooklyn’s primary care should not be entrusted to her stepmother.

Sheree also speculates that Steve might eventually return to Tennessee, which would render her request moot. She accuses Steve of complicating the situation with his “unstable living decisions” and emphasizes that she initially hoped for honest and reasonable co-parenting but is now forced to seek court intervention.

What This Means for Brooklyn and the Family

The ongoing custody battle between Steve and Sheree Burton highlights the challenges many separated parents face when balancing relocation, visitation rights, and the best interests of their children. Brooklyn’s well-being remains at the center of the dispute, with both parents asserting their commitment to maintaining a strong relationship with her.

Sheree’s insistence on maintaining open communication between Brooklyn and Steve through digital means underscores the evolving nature of co-parenting in the digital age. Meanwhile, the court’s decision on Sheree’s relocation request will likely set a precedent for how custody arrangements adapt to parents’ changing circumstances.

Looking Ahead: The Court’s Role and Potential Outcomes

As the court reviews Sheree’s motion to move to Tennessee, several factors will be considered, including Brooklyn’s stability, the parents’ living situations, and the quality of communication between all parties involved. The judge will weigh whether the proposed move serves Brooklyn’s best interests and how it might impact her relationship with both parents.

Steve Burton’s legal team has yet to comment publicly on the matter. Meanwhile, Sheree’s attorney has indicated that without cooperative co-parenting, they will continue to rely on the court to resolve these disputes.

Conclusion

The custody dispute between Steve Burton and Sheree Burton remains a complex and evolving situation, with both parents striving to prioritize their daughter Brooklyn’s well-being. Sheree’s denial of alienation claims and her request to relocate to Tennessee highlight the challenges of co-parenting across state lines and the importance of stability for children in such arrangements.

If you are navigating a similar custody or relocation issue, it’s crucial to understand your rights and the factors courts consider in these cases. Stay informed and seek professional legal advice to ensure the best outcome for your family.

For more insights and updates on custody disputes and family law, subscribe to our newsletter and stay connected with expert advice tailored to your needs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *